Online Safety Community

Here we go again -- OSHA on wrong path with injury prevention proposal

OSHA is headed in the wrong direction with its Injury and Illness Prevention Program (I2P2), according to Jim Stanley, a former No. 2 at OSHA headquarters. While he agrees that requiring companies to have a safety and health program is a good idea, he says OSHA is off-course in trying to be very specific about what should be in company plans. www.fdrsafety.com/blog

Views: 113

Replies to This Discussion

I agree many companies have unique circumstances that do not fit into cookie cutter solutions and OSHA should work with a broad cross spectrum of industry identifying hazards most commonly found in daily activities.

That stated, it is incumbent on each of us who are professional practitioners in Health and Safety to also understand that this is not cause for wide spread panic, the system will not undergo drastic and draconian changes, it will feature enhancements to existing programs creating more work for our profession. How can that be a bad thing?
The conversion from the old safety and health control outline, to the newer Illness Injury Prevention program, I2P2, is a really a gradual interception from 1989 to the current safety and Accident prevention methods of the I2P2 program. The early I2P2 safety programs may now seem dictatorial and one sided, that of the management and safety team, but now in October 20, 1998, OSHA convened a Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA). A panel drafting the I2P2 Safety and Health Programming rules, consisting of the small entity representatives, SER, developed guidelines to improve the Accident and Illness Prevention Standards. Major guidelines:
1. Management duties goal setting, planning and allocating resources, and assigning and communicating roles.
2. Employee participation, involving employees to establish, maintain and evaluate their program by providing employee access to safety and health information, and providing employees a role in incident investigations
3. Hazard identification and assessment, incident investigation, safety changes within workplaces, emergency hazard assessment and prioritization,
4. Hazard prevention and control and control priorities, follow-up with effectiveness of safety and health controls;
5. Education and training, develop relationships to other OSHA training requirements and periodic training
6. Program evaluation monitoring and performance improvement; correcting program deficiencies,

The idea of better employee and employer collaboration is overdue to take off the ground! Utilizing employee participation to outline safety protocols certainly will not be a negative effort. It is the employee, the work-force themselves they will be protected. For myself, I have always questioned why employees are not consulted and asked questions about their work and what would make it safe and better, or about safety and health ideas to make their work place better. When the workforce is asked for a opinions about safety and health analysis and work protocols, only then will management see and understand the value in a Behavior Based Safety, the philosophy of the, Plan-Do-Check Cycle, to recognize, test, study and then implement procedures and protocols so to help to reinforce the I2P2 concept.
Stake holder concerns about the I2P2 having a huge gap between employee and employer dictation should be greatly narrowed. The usual, relying on a participatory and voluntary plan may make it easier for employers to design a safety and wellness program, but in the end there seems to be only one way for employers and employees to come together; that is to empower employees to assist in designing safety awareness for their own professions. The one glaring obstacle to this philosophy may be the need to increase budgets. This is an obstacle that will always cause concern to business owners. Unfortunately cost of business for safety is real and also in the long run can save lives. Saving live and preventing injuries lessens the insurance rates, but more importantly brings working men and women home at night. I see very little negativity in the I2P2 concept. Business can adjust if they care. I also believe congress should give incentives to increase the I2P2 concept through generous deductions and incentives. After all an incapacitated worker cannot pay taxes! Business must have the support to meet the needs for worker safety; on the other hand, there needs to be a way to insure compliance is made to insure this happens.

RSS

Take our poll!

Take our poll!

Latest Activity

Mark Nilson posted events
2 hours ago
John Robinson posted a blog post

eCTD Submissions of IND-NDA to the US FDA, EU and Canada

The international agreement to assemble all Quality, Safety and Efficacy information for a drug or biologic product into a common format (called the CTD - Common Technical Document) has improved the speed and efficiency for companies working in global development programs and clarified expectations by regulatory bodies.  Reformatting for multiple submissions is substantially limited.  The CTD has improved the regulatory review processes and enabled implementation of good review practices. The…See More
4 hours ago
Training Doyens posted an event
Thumbnail

Live Webinar on How to Hire, Retain, and Grow a Diverse & Inclusive Workforce at 26468 E Walker Dr, Aurora, Colorado 80016

February 19, 2019 from 1pm to 2pm
OVERVIEWSTOP - Do not put out another hiring notice until you fully consider the ramifications of diversity and inclusion in the workplace.  Why is this important? First, if you have diverse customers, those customers will relate to the diverse employees helping them or selling to them. Second, to avoid a homogeneous culture where people want to fit in so desperately that…See More
10 hours ago
swethakumar posted a blog post

Fire Safety Tips For the WorkPlace

Fires are a preventable catastrophe which will cause many thousands of greenbacks harm, loss of production, loss of jobs and loss of lives.When controlled properly, the hearth is one in all our greatest allies within the geographic point, a quite helpful partner of trade. once it’s uncontrolled but, it will become our worst and most feared enemy.There are several easy things that you simply as an employee will do to minimize the danger of fireplace within the geographic point. Here are some…See More
yesterday

Discussion Forum

Fall protection 2 Replies

The campaign to stop falls in construction is well underway! In 2010, more than 10,000 construction workers were injured as a result of falling while working from heights. ASSE supports our Arizona…Continue

Started by Cory Zielke. Last reply by Jen McDade on Tuesday.

OSHA Construction market 1 Reply

by Sean SweeneyA big change has occurred in the Construction market that has significant implications on PPE experts and suppliers as well as those involved in the Construction business. That change…Continue

Tags: construction

Started by Safety Community. Last reply by Jen McDade Dec 17, 2018.

Swing Fall Hazards Elimination 1 Reply

Recently, I assisted a construction company that was working in some very unique situations.  In a nutshell, this client needed a level of movement that the suitable overhead anchor points and our…Continue

Tags: Falls, Lifelines, Swing, Protection, SRL

Started by Seth Newell. Last reply by Jen McDade Dec 4, 2018.

Best Practices in Construction Safety 3 Replies

I am looking for some examples of best safety practices in construction.

Tags: construction, practices, best, safety

Started by Karen Fuller. Last reply by Jen McDade Aug 21, 2018.

Innovative new construction safety products... 4 Replies

There are many products available today which have been specifically designed to reduce the risk of injury in construction.What new, innovative tools and products are you using on the job...any tools…Continue

Tags: safety, back, injury, construction, installation

Started by DoorJak Team. Last reply by Jen McDade Aug 20, 2018.

Badge

Loading…

© 2019   Created by Safety Community.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service