Online Safety Community

Testing GxP system that is FDA-compliant

Testing GxP system that is FDA-compliant

Process validation is the method of using data from stages ranging from the process design stage to production, to ensure that the process that is being used can deliver consistently high-quality products. Companies that come under the life sciences must comply with GxP regulations to ensure that their processes meet the regulatory guidelines to be GxP compliant. Computer Systems Validation is the method of ensuring that all computer systems used that go into the production of products in the life sciences industry comply with set regulations and meet the specifications relating to quality.

For the FDA, CSV is more than just hardware and software. It also includes any instruments that are linked to the computer system or are part of it, as well as staff that operate the computer system under set SOPs. The FDA considers GxP as being much broader, as it includes static and dynamic testing.

Testing GxP system that is FDA-compliant5

Testing and verifying of computerized systems is a crucial aspect of GxP systems. It is a means for showing that a computer system meets the intended requirements. Carrying out testing properly and appropriately is a major regulatory expectation, whose scope and nature have been defined by many regulations from the FDA, the EU’s GMP Annex 11 and other documents.

So, any regulated company has to demonstrate compliance with GxP regulations and show how fit these products are for their intended use. The criterion for the effectiveness of testing is its ability to show compliance with regulatory requirements. This is a means to ensuring the following:

  • Patient safety
  • Product quality
  • Data integrity as a result of controlling identified risks.

The guarantee that systems perform as intended for their use shortens the overall lifecycle of implementing and operating the system. It also prevents delays to the use of the system that could have happened because of the time taken to make corrections to the system.

Testing GxP system that is FDA-compliant1

At the other end, not carrying out testing adequately or appropriately could result in issues that could surface later on in the lifecycle. Detecting and fixing them at that point is very expensive, cumbersome and very time consuming. Not only do such systems fail to meet intended requirements; they also incur exorbitant costs into corrections, maintenance and support.

Not only these; not adequately and appropriately carrying out test functions adversely impacts in any or all of these:

  • Patient safety
  • Product quality
  • Data integrity
  • Regulatory compliance requirements
  • Ability to meet intended use of the system.
  • Stringent actions from the regulatory agencies, which could include citations and other penalties
  • The business bottom line and the company’s credibility.

A thorough guidance session

Testing GxP system that is FDA-compliant3

As can be seen from all these; testing of the GxP systems is an area in which no company can afford to be lax. The means of doing this in the right manner that meets the regulatory expectations and help avoid all of the undesirable effects listed above will be taught at a two-day seminar that is being organized by GlobalCompliancePanel, a leading provider of professional trainings for all the areas of regulatory compliance.

Angela Bazigos, a seasoned executive with 40 years of experience in the life sciences & healthcare industries, who is CEO, Touchstone Technologies Silicon Valley, will be the Director at this seminar. Please log on to Testing GxP system that is FDA-compliant to enroll for this seminar and gain from the experience that Angela brings into life sciences. This seminar has been pre-approved by RAPS as eligible for up to 12 credits towards a participant’s RAC recertification upon full completion.

All areas and aspects of GxP testing

The various GxP testing methods and their varieties should be based on risk, complexity and novelty of the software. The aim is to confirm that system specifications have been met. The company may have to carry out multiple stages of review and testing depending on the type of system, the development method applied and the use of computerized system. The testing being of such a complex nature; companies should have the ability to justify the method chosen and the sufficiency of their testing approach.

The use of a scientific Quality Management System such as ICH Q9 to determine the appropriate level of verification and documentation goes a long way in making the testing process effective.  Demonstrating that all required risk controls are in place is one of the purposes of designing tests. Whenever changes are proposed to the system, they should be followed by an impact analysis to determine the extent of any reverification, including any regression testing required. These changes to the system should be made only in accordance with a predefined change control procedure, which should include provision for proposing, approving and/or backing out of the change.

Angela will explain all these in detail at this session. In the process of this explanation, she will cover the following areas:

  • How does testing fit into GaMP5 lifecycle?
  • Risk based methodology for testing
  • How do I leverage supplier testing?
  • What should I test?
  • How much testing is enough?
  • How should I conduct the tests?
  • How should I document my testing?
  • How do I maintain the testing integrity of my system?
  • Testing related 483s and Warning Letters
  • Case Studies.

 

keep continue to FDA compliant

Views: 59

Comment

You need to be a member of Online Safety Community to add comments!

Join Online Safety Community

Take our poll!

Take our poll!

Latest Activity

John Robinson posted a blog post

FDA Scrutiny of Promotion and Advertising Practices

If you go "off label" with advertising and promotion, FDA's hammer can hit hard and seemingly out of the blue. Advertising and promotion for devices is weak and lacks legal clarity. For drugs, the regulations are prescriptive and guidance documents clamp down on nuances. Marketing and regulatory affairs departments must collaborate to avoid the hammer and penalties of FDA. The roadblock, however is that marketing managers and regulatory affairs managers rarely reach common ground and are loathe…See More
1 hour ago
kate smith posted blog posts
2 hours ago
Traininngdotcom-LLC posted blog posts
3 hours ago
Mark Nilson posted events
3 hours ago

Forum

How to provide safety to the small laboratories at schools? 4 Replies

Most schools in villages are opening small chemistry laboratories and allowing the students to experiment whatever they have been taught. The education quality of village schools is not up to the…Continue

Started by charlieelectra. Last reply by Jen McDade 8 hours ago.

Workers paticipation in safety management 1 Reply

Workers paticipation in safety management is the aspect which is required to be implemented in the OHSAS 18001 2007 version. , I invite our experience community members to share their views on the…Continue

Tags: management, safety, in, paticipation, Workers

Started by SafetyRaja. Last reply by Jen McDade yesterday.

Road Safety

What can be the best measures for Road Safety?Continue

Started by Jen McDade Sep 27.

safety equipments in breweries 4 Replies

safety equipments in breweries -- kindly provide detailsContinue

Started by ajit. Last reply by Jen McDade Sep 24.

Unusual Safety Tips 10 Replies

Please share some unusual but genuine safety precautions.My unusual safety tips - Don't drink sweet fruity juice while driving in the night as it contains sugar and sugar slows down your blood…Continue

Started by Arnold Brame. Last reply by Jen McDade Sep 24.

Badge

Loading…

© 2018   Created by Safety Community.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service